Contango Announces First Quarter 2015 Financial Results and Provides Operations Update
First Quarter 2015 Highlights
- Production of 8.7 Bcfe for the quarter
-
Net loss of
$18.6 million and Adjusted EBITDAX of$14.0 million for the quarter - Commenced production from initial multi-well pad drilled on 500 foot spacing in our Chalktown area
-
Commenced production from third well in our
Elm Hill Project , with two additional wells expected to begin production in the second quarter -
Commenced initial flowback on first
Mowry Shale test inNatrona County, Wyoming -
Borrowing base redetermined at
$225 million , throughNovember 1, 2015
Management Commentary
Summary Financial Results for the Quarter Ended
Net loss for the three months ended
The Company reported Adjusted EBITDAX, as defined below, of
approximately
Revenues for the three months ended
Production for the three months ended
The weighted average equivalent sales price during the three months
ended
Operating expenses for the three months ended
Lease operating expenses, transportation and processing costs and
workover expenses for the three months ended
Exploration costs for the three months ended
DD&A expenses for the three months ended
Impairment and abandonment expense from oil and gas properties for the
quarter ended
G&A expenses for the three months ended
Derivative Instruments
In
Commodity | Period | Derivative |
Volume / Month |
Price / Unit (1) | |||||||||
Crude Oil |
|
Collar | 35,000 Bbls |
|
|||||||||
Crude Oil |
|
Collar | 25,000 Bbls |
|
|||||||||
|
(1) Commodity derivative based on NYMEX West Texas Intermediate crude oil prices. |
Drilling Activity Update
Chalktown Area,
We initiated a multi-well pad drilling strategy, on 500 foot spacing, in our Chalktown area in late-2014, a strategy where three wells are drilled in succession, completed in succession, and subsequently put on production. While it will take several months of production to determine the true effectiveness of the down-spacing strategy on ultimate recovery and return on investment, i.e. compared with fewer wells on 1,000 foot spacing, early results are as follows:
Total Measured |
||||||||||||||||
PAD 1 |
WI% |
Depth (ft.) |
Lateral (ft.) |
Frac Stages |
First Production |
|||||||||||
Vick Trust B 2H | 69% | 16,163 | 7,260 | 30 |
|
|||||||||||
Vick Trust B 3H | 68% | 15,818 | 6,542 | 29 |
|
|||||||||||
Vick Trust B 5H | 69% | 16,235 | 7,360 | 28 |
|
|||||||||||
The Vick Trust B three-well pad averaged 2,400 Boed for the initial 30 days and is still producing approximately 1,850 Boed after 100 days of production. Optimization is still ongoing.
Total Measured |
||||||||||||||||
PAD 2 |
WI% |
Depth (ft.) |
Lateral (ft.) |
Frac Stages |
Status |
|||||||||||
Barr Unit A 2H | 51% | 15,570 | 6,554 | 25 | Flowing Back | |||||||||||
Barr Unit B 3H | 67% | 15,250 | 5,583 | 22 | Flowing Back | |||||||||||
Barr Unit B 4H | 67% | 14,943 | 5,350 | 21 | Flowing Back | |||||||||||
Barr Unit A 2H | 56% | 15,065 | 5,728 | 22 | Flowing Back | |||||||||||
The Barr Unit four-well pad has been online for less than 30 days; however, early flowback from the pad is showing good results with approximately 2,000 Boed. Optimization is still ongoing. Additionally, we have the following two wells in progress:
Total Measured |
30 Day Avg IP |
|||||||||||||||||||||
WI% |
Depth (ft.) |
Lateral (ft.) |
Frac Stages |
Status |
(boed) |
% Oil |
||||||||||||||||
Viniarski A 1H | 68% | 16,773 | 7,656 | 30 | Flowing Back | TBD | TBD | |||||||||||||||
Hoke 1H (pilot) | 70% | 10,700 | n/a | n/a | Evaluating | TBD | TBD | |||||||||||||||
The Viniarski A 1H is currently flowing back 800 Boed and is just shy of 30 days of production.
In keeping with our previously stated objective of identifying and evaluating new resource play potential, the Hoke 1H well was drilled as a vertical pilot well in the Chalktown Area with 250' of whole core recovered for enhanced reservoir analysis. The primary zone of interest is the Lower Lewisville Sand which has not been completed in any vertical or horizontal wells at this time. The section underlies the Upper Lewisville which has been the target in the 12 horizontal wells drilled to date in Chalktown. This Lower Lewisville is approximately 130' thick as compared to the Upper Lewisville thickness of 50'. Early log indications are encouraging and we are currently awaiting the final core analysis of this zone prior to commencing any drilling for this potentially significant objective. Additional prospective zones were encountered in the wellbore and those will be fully evaluated also.
We finalized, during the quarter, a
Total Measured |
Status / First |
30 Day Avg IP |
||||||||||||||||||||
Well |
WI% |
Depth (ft.) |
Lateral (ft.) |
Frac Stages |
Production |
(boed) |
% Oil |
|||||||||||||||
Norwood 2H | 90% | 17,699 | 7,744 | 30 | Evaluating | TBD | TBD | |||||||||||||||
In addition, we drilled the Stokes #1H well in the same area to a depth
of 10,300 feet in early 2014. This was a vertical pilot well for which a
whole core was recovered in the Eagle Ford and other formations. We are
encouraged by the core data from the Eagle Ford formation as to its
comparisons to petrophysical and geologic properties that are seen in
the productive areas of the East Texas Eagle Ford seen to the west in
We have commenced production from three wells in our
Total Measured |
||||||||||
Well |
WI% |
Depth (ft.) |
Status |
|||||||
|
50% | 15,513 | Completing | |||||||
Jennifer 1H | 50% | 13,722 | Completing | |||||||
To date, we and our partner have successfully drilled five vertical pilot holes (where four whole cores were recovered) to evaluate six hydrocarbon bearing formations that have potential for development. The five horizontal wells that we have drilled are testing for three of the six formations. Once we evaluate the results from each formation and area, we will develop a comprehensive program for further development of our approximate 55,000 gross acre position. At that point, we will be prepared to release what the composite results are and how they were evaluated in developing our strategy.
During the fourth quarter of 2014, we drilled the Beeler Unit 24H as a
vertical pilot well to evaluate the Eagle Ford in
We have two wells in
Total Measured |
30 Day Avg IP |
|||||||||||||||||||||
WI% |
Depth (ft.) |
Lateral (ft.) |
Frac Stages |
Status |
(boed) |
% Oil |
||||||||||||||||
State 35-79-16 1H | 60% | 12,944 | 5,911 | 25 | Flowing back | TBD | TBD | |||||||||||||||
Elliot 13-44-66 1H | 80% | 13,116 | 6,601 | 30 | Completing | TBD | TBD | |||||||||||||||
We will evaluate the results from these two wells for a number of months before determining future drilling plans for these areas.
Continued R&D Efforts
Of the ten pilot holes discussed above, nine whole cores averaging 200' in length were recovered. Enhanced formation evaluation tools were employed on all of the pilot holes. We have also joined industry consortiums, where possible, to leverage the collected data on our wells to their maximum value relative to play concepts for the future. With the ongoing R&D efforts across our major activity areas, we are positioning ourselves for a focused, meaningful drilling program in a more robust commodity market in the future.
2015 Capital Program & Liquidity
Capital expenditures incurred for the three months ended
We currently anticipate that our total capital expenditure program for
2015 will be
As of
The credit facility has a borrowing base of
Selected Financial and Operating Data
The following table reflects certain comparative financial and operating
data for the three month periods ended
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | % | ||||||||||
Offshore Volumes Sold: | ||||||||||||
Oil and condensate (Mbbls) | 54 | 80 | -33% | |||||||||
Natural gas (Mmcf) | 4,659 | 5,370 | -13% | |||||||||
Natural gas liquids (Mbbls) | 132 | 166 | -20% | |||||||||
Natural gas equivalents (Mmcfe) | 5,781 | 6,848 | -16% | |||||||||
Onshore Volumes Sold: | ||||||||||||
Oil and condensate (Mbbls) | 188 | 277 | -32% | |||||||||
Natural gas (Mmcf) | 1,211 | 1,460 | -17% | |||||||||
Natural gas liquids (Mbbls) | 91 | 102 | -11% | |||||||||
Natural gas equivalents (Mmcfe) | 2,883 | 3,729 | -23% | |||||||||
Total Volumes Sold: | ||||||||||||
Oil and condensate (Mbbls) | 242 | 357 | -32% | |||||||||
Natural gas (Mmcf) | 5,870 | 6,830 | -14% | |||||||||
Natural gas liquids (Mbbls) | 223 | 268 | -17% | |||||||||
Natural gas equivalents (Mmcfe) | 8,664 | 10,577 | -18% | |||||||||
Daily Sales Volumes: | ||||||||||||
Oil and condensate (Mbbls) | 2.7 | 4.0 | -32% | |||||||||
Natural gas (Mmcf) | 65.2 | 75.9 | -14% | |||||||||
Natural gas liquids (Mbbls) | 2.5 | 3.0 | -17% | |||||||||
Natural gas equivalents (Mmcfe) | 96.3 | 117.5 | -18% | |||||||||
Average sales prices: | ||||||||||||
Oil and condensate (per Bbl) | $ | 44.10 | $ | 98.43 | -55% | |||||||
Natural gas (per Mcf) | $ | 2.87 | $ | 5.07 | -43% | |||||||
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl) | $ | 14.01 | $ | 39.31 | -64% | |||||||
Total (per Mcfe) | $ | 3.54 | $ | 7.59 | -53% | |||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | % | ||||||||||
Offshore Selected Costs ($ per Mcfe): | ||||||||||||
Lease operating expenses (1) | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.52 | 23% | |||||||
Production and ad valorem taxes | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.09 | -11% | |||||||
Depreciation and depletion expense | $ | 1.95 | $ | 1.66 | 17% | |||||||
Onshore Selected Costs ($ per Mcfe): | ||||||||||||
Lease operating expenses (1) | $ | 1.76 | $ | 1.23 | 43% | |||||||
Production and ad valorem taxes | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.62 | -63% | |||||||
Depreciation and depletion expense | $ | 8.27 | $ | 6.17 | 34% | |||||||
Average Selected Costs ($ per Mcfe): | ||||||||||||
Lease operating expenses (1) | $ | 1.01 | $ | 0.77 | 31% | |||||||
Production and ad valorem taxes | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.28 | -54% | |||||||
Depreciation and depletion expense | $ | 4.05 | $ | 3.25 | 25% | |||||||
General and administrative expense (cash) | $ | 0.77 | $ | 0.76 | 1% | |||||||
Interest expense | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.06 | 33% | |||||||
Adjusted EBITDAX (2) (thousands) | $ | 14,040 | $ | 58,029 | ||||||||
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding (thousands) | ||||||||||||
Basic | 18,939 | 19,071 | ||||||||||
Diluted | 18,939 | 19,071 | ||||||||||
(1) LOE includes transportation and workover expenses. |
(2) Adjusted EBITDAX is a non-GAAP financial measure. See below for a reconciliation to net loss. |
|
|
||||||||
2015 | 2014 | ||||||||
ASSETS |
|||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | — | $ | — | |||||
Accounts receivable, net | 21,767 | 25,309 | |||||||
Other current assets | 8,100 | 5,731 | |||||||
Net property and equipment | 743,381 | 748,623 | |||||||
Investments in affiliates and other non-current assets | 64,517 | 63,752 | |||||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 837,765 | $ | 843,415 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 73,802 | 92,892 | |||||||
Other current liabilities | 4,127 | 4,123 | |||||||
Long-term debt | 104,463 | 63,359 | |||||||
Deferred tax liability | 83,309 | 93,952 | |||||||
Asset retirement obligations | 22,028 | 21,623 | |||||||
Total shareholders' equity | 550,036 | 567,466 | |||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | $ | 837,765 | $ | 843,415 | |||||
Three Months Ended | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||
REVENUES | |||||||||||
Oil and condensate sales | $ | 10,694 | $ | 35,100 | |||||||
Natural gas sales | 16,823 | 34,627 | |||||||||
Natural gas liquids sales | 3,130 | 10,530 | |||||||||
Total revenues | 30,647 | 80,257 | |||||||||
EXPENSES | |||||||||||
Operating expenses | 9,911 | 11,053 | |||||||||
Exploration expenses | 4,483 | 26,931 | |||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 35,115 | 34,402 | |||||||||
Impairment and abandonment of oil and gas properties | 2,281 | 15,195 | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 7,828 | 10,457 | |||||||||
Total expenses | 59,618 | 98,038 | |||||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) | |||||||||||
Gain from investment in affiliates (net of income taxes) | 558 | 1,622 | |||||||||
Interest expense | (695 | ) | (668 | ) | |||||||
Loss on derivatives, net | — | (1,959 | ) | ||||||||
Other expense | (5 | ) | — | ||||||||
Total other income (expense) |
(142 | ) | (1,005 | ) | |||||||
NET LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES | (29,113 | ) | (18,786 | ) | |||||||
Income tax benefit | 10,549 | 8,593 | |||||||||
NET LOSS | $ | (18,564 | ) | $ | (10,193 | ) | |||||
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
EBITDAX represents net income (loss) before interest expense, taxes, and depreciation, depletion and amortization, and oil & gas expenses. Adjusted EBITDAX represents EBITDAX as further adjusted to reflect the items set forth in the table below, all of which will be required in determining our compliance with financial covenants under the RBC Credit Facility.
We have included EBITDAX and Adjusted EBITDAX in this release to provide investors with a supplemental measure of our operating performance and information about the calculation of some of the financial covenants that are contained in our credit agreements. We believe EBITDAX is an important supplemental measure of operating performance because it eliminates items that have less bearing on our operating performance and so highlights trends in our core business that may not otherwise be apparent when relying solely on GAAP financial measures. We also believe that securities analysts, investors and other interested parties frequently use EBITDAX in the evaluation of companies, many of which present EBITDAX when reporting their results. Adjusted EBITDAX is a material component of the covenants that are imposed on us by our credit agreements. We are subject to financial covenant ratios that are calculated by reference to Adjusted EBITDAX. Non-compliance with the financial covenants contained in these credit agreements could result in a default, an acceleration in the repayment of amounts outstanding and a termination of lending commitments. Our management and external users of our financial statements, such as investors, commercial banks, research analysts and others, also use EBITDAX and Adjusted EBITDAX to assess:
- the financial performance of our assets without regard to financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis;
- the ability of our assets to generate cash sufficient to pay interest costs and support our indebtedness;
- our operating performance and return on capital as compared to those of other companies in our industry, without regard to financing or capital structure; and
- the feasibility of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects and the overall rates of return on alternative investment opportunities.
EBITDAX and Adjusted EBITDAX are not presentations made in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. As discussed above, we believe that the presentation of EBITDAX and Adjusted EBITDAX in this release is appropriate. However, when evaluating our results, you should not consider EBITDAX and Adjusted EBITDAX in isolation of, or as a substitute for, measures of our financial performance as determined in accordance with GAAP, such as net income (loss). EBITDAX and Adjusted EBITDAX have material limitations as performance measures because they exclude items that are necessary elements of our costs and operations. Because other companies may calculate EBITDAX and Adjusted EBITDAX differently than we do, EBITDAX may not be, and Adjusted EBITDAX as presented in this release is not, comparable to similarly-titled measures reported by other companies.
The following table reconciles net loss to EBITDAX and Adjusted EBITDAX for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (18,564 | ) | $ | (10,193 | ) | |||||
Interest expense | 695 | 668 | |||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) | (10,549 | ) | (8,593 | ) | |||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 35,115 | 34,402 | |||||||||
Exploration expenses | 4,483 | 26,931 | |||||||||
EBITDAX | $ | 11,180 | $ | 43,215 | |||||||
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments | $ | — | $ | 257 | |||||||
Non-cash stock-based compensation charges | 1,140 | 1,086 | |||||||||
Impairment of oil and gas properties | 2,270 | 15,093 | |||||||||
Gain on sale of assets and investment in affiliates | (550 | ) | (1,622 | ) | |||||||
Adjusted EBITDAX | $ | 14,040 | $ | 58,029 | |||||||
Guidance for Second Quarter 2015
The Company is providing the following guidance for the second calendar quarter of 2015.
Second quarter 2015 production | 90,000 - 100,000 Mcfe per day | |||||
LOE (including transportation and workovers) |
|
|||||
Production and ad valorem taxes | 3.7% | |||||
(% of Revenue) | ||||||
Cash G&A |
|
|||||
DD&A rate |
|
|||||
Teleconference Call
Contango management will hold a conference call to discuss the
information described in this press release on
This press release contains forward-looking statements regarding
Contango that are intended to be covered by the safe harbor
"forward-looking statements" provided by the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995, based on Contango's current expectations
and includes statements regarding acquisitions and divestitures,
estimates of future production, future results of operations, quality
and nature of the asset base, the assumptions upon which estimates are
based and other expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions,
strategies or statements about future events or performance (often, but
not always, using words such as "expects," "projects," "anticipates,"
"plans," "estimates," "potential," "possible," "probable," or "intends,"
or stating that certain actions, events or results "may," "will,"
"should," or "could" be taken, occur or be achieved). Statements
concerning oil and gas reserves also may be deemed to be forward-looking
statements in that they reflect estimates based on certain assumptions
that the resources involved can be economically exploited.
Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates
and projections that involve a number of risks and uncertainties, which
could cause actual results to differ materially from those, reflected in
the statements. These risks include, but are not limited to: the risks
of the oil and gas industry (for example, operational risks in exploring
for, developing and producing crude oil and natural gas; risks and
uncertainties involving geology of oil and gas deposits; the uncertainty
of reserve estimates; the uncertainty of estimates and projections
relating to future production, costs and expenses; potential delays or
changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or
capital expenditures; health, safety and environmental risks and risks
related to weather such as hurricanes and other natural disasters);
uncertainties as to the availability and cost of financing; fluctuations
in oil and gas prices; risks associated with derivative positions;
inability to realize expected value from acquisitions, inability of our
management team to execute its plans to meet its goals, shortages of
drilling equipment, oil field personnel and services, unavailability of
gathering systems, pipelines and processing facilities and the
possibility that government policies may change or governmental
approvals may be delayed or withheld. Additional information on these
and other factors which could affect Contango's operations or financial
results are included in Contango's other reports on file with the
Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
or
Vice President and Treasurer
Source:
News Provided by Acquire Media